Broken Circle Breakdown
This is a film of
contradictions – and as a Flemish bluegrass film, why wouldn’t it be? I loved
it and was wasted by it. It is simultaneously a bit slow and intensely
passionate. The central couple is intimate and supportive but they have trouble
connecting when it counts. But mostly the contradictions live in the central
character (played by the co-author of the original play the film is based on).
This character,
Didier, is a contemporary European atheist who comes alive most deeply in his
love of spiritual American bluegrass music. When tragedy strikes (the film,
which weaves back and forth in time quite effectively, begins with their
daughter being treated for leukemia), Didier’s inner battle emerges in his
anguish. His rant against religion (mostly fundamentalism but his critique is
broad) is about as intense as you’re ever going to hear. (So don’t watch this
unless you’re ok with your faith getting kicked in the head now and then.) But
can you have that much passion unless you’re actually desperate to believe that
the music you love is more true than you know? And what the heck are the
filmmakers' trying to say in the last couple of scenes?
This is a very
impressive film – beautifully filmed, with great acting, laced through with
awesome music (and I’m not normally a huge fan of bluegrass). And so I would
love to recommend this film. But the last contradiction is that I can’t. I’ll
give it ***+ and a mug held high, but don’t watch this unless your emotional
seatbelt is fastened and you don’t mind no-holds-barred attempts to sort out a
world of pain, reason, and faith.
Comments
Post a Comment